<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Adrants - Latest Comments in Viral Marketing: What Works, What Doesn't and Why</title><link>http://adrants.disqus.com/</link><description>Marketing and Advertising News with Attitude</description><atom:link href="https://adrants.disqus.com/viral_marketing_what_works_what_doesnt_and_why/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:05:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Viral Marketing: What Works, What Doesn't and Why</title><link>http://www.adrants.com/2008/07/viral-marketing-what-works-what.php#comment-98359171</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nowadays, it's getting really tempting to shout our brand and control the video production. So it's cool to be reminded by this old post that subtle video marketing has worked and is still working now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And despite feeling we could do it better, a hands-off approach to our 'user-advertising partners' can lead to a more creative campaign, a positive response from our customers, and a much higher sales conversion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">celinamac</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:05:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>